Is There A Future For Spam?
You have permission to publish this article electronically
or in print, free of charge, as long as the bylines are
included. A courtesy copy of your publication would be
appreciated - send to niall.roche@blaggard.com.
Title: Is There A Future For Spam?
Word Count: 544
Author: Niall Roche
Email: niall.roche@blaggard.com
Article URL: www.submityourarticle.com/articles/easypublish.php?art_id=1817
The article is preformatted to 60CPL.
Is There A Future For Spam?
Copyright 2005 Niall Roche
Will you always be buried underneath a mountain of spam? Is
there any light at the end of the tunnel? With the current
flood of spam to your inbox and ever more devious practices
on the part of spammers you'd be forgiven for thinking that
spam is here to stay.
The tide has turned folks. It may not seem like that right
now with spam being just as abundant as ever. Spammers are
getting desperate though. Their most recent move to use
home computers as spam zombies demonstrates this
desperation quite clearly. For spammers to want to use low
speed cable and DSL connections to send their junk email
means one thing - the email servers they're normally using
are being blocked as quickly as they go online.
This is not to say that spam will just disappear. The
volume of spam you're receiving hasn't noticeably reduced.
Not yet but it will. Education is beginning to take effect.
People are deleting spam instead of replying to it. Home
users are hiding their PCs behind firewalls, antivirus
software and spam filters. Companies are implementing
enforcable Internet policies which prevent employees from
sending spam, jokes or otherwise, during working hours.
Even Microsoft have made a committment to fighting spam.
Their recent buyout of Giant Software may see spam
filtering as a default feature in the next version of
Microsoft Windows perhaps?
Let's just imagine for a second what might happen if spam
doesn't decrease over the next few years.
The geographical hotspots for spammers are Russia, China
and the Phillipines. Could a government ,say perhaps the US
Government, take a drastic step. Maybe initiate an
electronic first strike on the countries which host junk
email servers which are used to send out billions of pieces
of spam every day? The US already have military Cyber
Warfare teams fending off attacks from hackers working for
foreign Governments. How hard would it be for them to
initiate a cyber assault on spam servers? The US and China
actively trade cyber warfare body blows every single day -
although this is never discussed on the evening news.
Could data embargos be used to "choke" spammers of their
online resources? The Internet itself is compromised of 13
central "pillars" and millions of nodes. A joint venture
between the US, UK and the EU could theoretically shut down
entire nodes to certain countries - a sort of E-embargo. No
data in. No data out. In a world that relies so heavily on
data this could bring any offending spam supporting country
to its knees in just a few hours.
What's the likelihood of either scenario ever developing?
Anywhere from non-existent to highly probable. We live in a
world where absolutes mean nothing as each day passes and
we surpass what was previously thought impossible.
The future of spam is a dim one. Public outrage and the
drain on bandwidth and Internet resources as a whole has
forged a bond of common anger between Joe Soap users and
big business worldwide. The message is clear - Spam Has To
Go!
What was once a very lucrative business for the spammer may
soon be putting up a "Closed Due To Lack of Business" sign.
Let's hope so.
About the Author:
Niall Roche runs Spam-Site.com which reviews and tests spam
blockers and also provides tons of information on the
origins of spam and how to fight it.
www.spam-site.com
|