Why Six Sigma Will Outlast Total Quality Management
Six Sigma is not just a new term for Total Quality Management
(TQM) . They have many similarities and are compatible in many
business environments. TQM has brought great improvements and
value to many companies. Six Sigma can do more.
TQM is the development, deployment, and maintenance of systems
related to quality-producing business processes. TQM is a
strategic approach that focuses on encouraging a continuous
flow of incremental quality improvements. It encourages the
establishing of a culture of collaboration among different
departments within organization. TQM is mainly a cultural
initiative and a style of management toward increased quality.
Six Sigma is not just another quality initiative or process
improvement program. It is more than that because it is a
robust continuous improvement strategy and process that
includes cultural methodologies such as the various TQM
approaches. Six Sigma is complementary to TQM initiatives such
as ISO 9000 registration, which is mainly procedural; Total
Quality Management (TQM), which is mainly cultural, and
Statistical Process Control (SPC), which is primarily
statistical process control monitoring. All of these
initiatives attempt to improve quality levels but typically
reach a plateau. The Six Sigma approach goes to the next level.
Six Sigma is not about quality in the strict traditional sense.
Quality, defined traditionally as conformance to internal
requirements, is not the focus of Six Sigma. True, Six Sigma
focuses on improving quality by helping organizations produce
products and services better, faster and cheaper. However, it
accomplishes that by reducing waste. In traditional terms, Six
Sigma focuses on defect prevention, cycle time reduction, and
cost savings. Six Sigma is about helping the organization make
more money. Unlike cost-cutting programs that reduce value and
quality, Six Sigma identifies and eliminates costs that provide
no value to customers: the costs incurred due to waste.
The focus of TQM initiatives differs from the focus of Six
Sigma programs. One, TQM programs focus on improvement in
individual operations with unrelated processes. Six Sigma
focuses on making improvements in all operations within a
process. Two, Six Sigma involves dedicated, full-time
resources—the “black belts” —versus TQM, which is usually a
part-time activity of non-dedicated managers.
The breadth and depth and the precision of Six Sigma and TQM
also differ. Six Sigma has a well-defined project charter that
outlines the scope of a project, financial targets, anticipated
benefits, milestones, etc. It's based on hard financial data and
savings. In TQM, organizations go into a project without fully
knowing what the financial gains might be. Six Sigma has a
solid control phase (DMAIC –
Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) that makes specific
measurements, identifies specific problems, and provides
specific solutions that can be measured.
How else is Six Sigma different? Six Sigma is:
* Fact based and data driven
* Results-oriented, providing quantifiable and measurable
bottom-line results
* A leader-sponsored top-down approach
* Linked to strategy
* Thinking about customer requirements
* Applicable to all business processes - administrative, sales,
marketing, R&D, etc.
Six Sigma is a robust continuous improvement strategy and
process that includes cultural methodologies such as Total
Quality Management (TQM), process control strategies such as
Statistical Process Control (SPC) and other important
statistical tools. Six Sigma tools and techniques all are found
in total quality management. Six Sigma is the application of the
tools on selected important projects at the appropriate time.
Six Sigma tools and techniques all are found in TQM. When done
correctly, Six Sigma becomes a way toward organization and
cultural development. Yet, it is more than a set of tools! Six
Sigma is the strategic and systematic application of the tools
on targeted important projects at the appropriate time. Because
Six Sigma incorporates TQM but goes beyond it, it will outlast
TQM.
About The Author: Peter Peterka is the Principal Consultant
www.6sigma.us/aboutus.php in practice areas of DMAIC and
DFSS. Peter has eleven years of experience performing as a
Master Black Belt
www.6sigma.us/six-sigma-black-belt.php, and has over 15
years experience in industry as an improvement specialist and
engineer working with numerous companies.
|