The Difference Between Typical Project Management And Six Sigma Project Management
The Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK) became an
accepted standard (as established by the Project Management
Institute) that is still widely used in many industries around
the world. At a basic level, many of the methodologies
advocated by PMBoK and Six Sigma have a great deal in common.
Both seek to establish a sound plan; identify and communicate
with stakeholders; conduct regular reviews; and manage
schedule, cost, and resources.
Six Sigma is not just another project management initiative or
process improvement program. Six Sigma is not just a new term
for project management nor is it a mere repackaging of old
concepts. It is more than that because it is a robust
continuous improvement strategy and process that includes
cultural and statistical methodologies. Six Sigma is
complementary with existing project management programs and
standards but differs in significant ways. Both disciplines
seek to reduce failures, prevent defects, control costs and
schedules, and manage risk. Generally, professional project
management attempts to achieve these goals by encouraging best
practices on a project-by-project basis, often through the
mechanism of a project office that promulgates policy, provides
templates and advice, promotes appropriate use of tools such as
critical path method, and perhaps performs periodic project
reviews.
Too many project management methods have failed not because
they weren't adding value but because you couldn't measure the
effectiveness of the methodology or quantify the value added by
process changes. Six Sigma provides a structured data-driven
methodology with tools and techniques that companies can use to
measure their performance both before and after Six Sigma
projects. Using Six Sigma, management can measure the baseline
performance of their processes and determine the root causes of
variations so they can improve their processes to meet and
exceed the desired performance levels.
Six Sigma allows managers to take their projects to new levels
of discipline and comprehensive commitment. For standard
project management ideas, you can approach them ad hoc and
implement them as you learn them. You can't do Six Sigma
halfheartedly, and that is a good thing. Six Sigma is not for
dabblers. You can't implement it piecemeal. If you’re in,
you’re in deep, and you’re in for the long haul. Again, that is
a good thing because that level of commitment not only gets
everyone involved and keeps them involved but also leads to
more substantial and far-reaching change in your processes.
There are many challenges facing project managers: data
gathering and analysis, problem solving, understanding and
evaluating existing processes, developing and tracking
measurements in a standardized manner, and making quantitative
evaluations. Six Sigma methodology provides tools and
techniques to help a manager be successful in all of these
challenges. This success is accomplished by means of
understanding what the methodology is, how it is applied, and
how it used.
Six Sigma is not simply another supplement to an organization's
existing management methods. It is a complementary management
methodology that is integrated into and replaces the existing
ways of determining, analyzing, and resolving/avoiding
problems, as well as achieving business and customer
requirements objectively and methodically. Six Sigma can be
applied to operational management issues, or it can directly
support strategic management development and implementation.
Six Sigma's set of tools are more broadly applicable than those
commonly applied within typical project management. Six Sigma is
more oriented toward solutions of problems at their root cause
and prevention of their recurrence rather than attempting to
control potential causes of failure on a project-by-project
basis.
The breadth, depth, and precision of Six Sigma also
differentiate it from typical project management. Six Sigma has
a well-defined project charter that outlines the scope of a
project, financial targets, anticipated benefits, milestones,
etc. It’s based on hard financial data and savings. In typical
project management, organizations go into a project without
fully knowing what the financial gains might be. Six Sigma has
a solid control phase (DMAIC:
Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) that makes specific
measurements, identifies specific problems, and provides
specific solutions that can be measured.
Six Sigma is a robust continuous improvement strategy and
process that includes cultural methodologies such as Total
Quality Management (TQM), process control strategies such as
Statistical Process Control (SPC), and other important
statistical tools. When done correctly, Six Sigma becomes a way
toward organization and cultural development, but it is more
than a set of tools. Six Sigma is the strategic and systematic
application of the tools on targeted important projects at the
appropriate time to bring about significant and lasting change
in an organization as a whole.
About The Author: Peter Peterka is the Principal Consultant
www.6sigma.us/aboutus.php in practice areas of DMAIC and
DFSS. Peter has eleven years of experience performing as a
Master Black Belt
www.6sigma.us/six-sigma-black-belt.php, and has over 15
years experience in industry as an improvement specialist and
engineer working with numerous companies.
|