Doing Business on the Internet - Part I
This letter constitutes a permission to reprint or mirror any and
all of the materials mentioned or linked to herein subject
to appropriate credit and linkback. Every article published MUST
include the author bio, including the link to the author's Web site
(at the bottom of this message).
===============================================================
IntDoing Business on the Internet - Part I
By Sam Vaknin
Author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited"
These essays were published by the Israeli (Hebrew) edition of PC
Magazine back in 1996, when the Internet was in its formative epoch.
I have left them essentially unchanged, except for a few minor
errata I corrected. I find time travel fascinating. It is
interesting to recall the mainstream view, ten years ago, about the
Internet, its goals, its role, and its future. So, here goes:
The State of the Net in 1996
An Interim Report about the Future of the Internet
Who are the participants who constitute the Internet?
a.. Users - connected to the net and interacting with it;
b.. The communications lines and the communications equipment;
c.. The intermediaries (e.g. the suppliers of on-line information
or access providers);
d.. Hardware manufacturers;
e.. Software authors and manufacturers (browsers, site development
tools, specific applications, smart agents, search engines and
others);
f.. The "Hitchhikers" (search engines, smart agents, Artificial
Intelligence - AI - tools and more);
g.. Content producers and providers;
h.. Suppliers of financial wherewithal (currently - corporate and
institutional cash gradually being replaced by advertising money).
The fate of each of these components - separately and in solidarity -
will determine the fate of the Internet.
The first phase of the Internet's history was dominated by computer
wizards. Thus, any attempt at predicting its future dealt mainly
with its hardware and software components.
Media experts, sociologists, psychologists, advertising and
marketing executives were left out of the collective effort to
determine the future face of the Internet.
As far as content is concerned, the Internet cannot be currently
defined as a medium. It does not function as one - rather it is a
very disordered library, mostly incorporating the writings of non-
distinguished megalomaniacs. It is the ultimate Narcissistic
experience. The forceful entry of publishing houses and content
aggregators is changing this dismal landscape, though.
Ever since the invention of television there hasn't been anything as
begging to become a medium as the Internet.
Three analogies spring to mind when contemplating the Internet in
its current state:
a.. A chaotic library
b.. A neural network or the latter day equivalent of previous
networks (telegraph, telephony, railways)
c.. A new continent
These metaphors prove to be very useful (even business-wise). They
permit us to define the commercial opportunities embedded in the
Internet.
Yet, they fail to assist us in predicting its future in its
transformation into a medium.
How does an invention become a medium? What happens to it when it
does become one? What is the thin line separating the initial
functioning of the invention from its transformation into a new
medium? In other words: when can we tell that some technological
advance gave birth to a new medium?
This work also deals with the image of the Internet once transformed
into a medium.
The Internet has the most unusual attributes in the history of media.
It has no central structure or organization. It is hardware and
software independent. It (almost) cannot be subjected to legislation
or to regulation. Consider the example of downloading music from the
internet - is it tantamount to an act of recording music (a
violation of copyright laws)? This has been the crux of the legal
battle between Diamond Multimedia (the manufacturers of the Rio MP3
device), MP3.com and Napster and the recording industry in America.
The Internet's data transfer channels are not linear - they are
random. Most of its "broadcast" cannot be "received" at all. It
allows for the narrowest of narrowcasting through the use of e-mail
mailing lists, discussion groups, message boards, private radio
stations, and chats. And this is but a small portion of an
impressive list of oddities. These idiosyncrasies will also shape
the nature of the Internet as a medium. Growing out of bizarre
roots - it is bound to yield strange fruit as a medium.
So what business opportunities does the Internet represent?
I believe that they are to be found in two broad categories:
a.. Software and hardware related to the Internet's future as a
medium
b.. Content creation, management and licencing
(continued)
==============================================================
AUTHOR BIO (must be included with the article)
Sam Vaknin ( samvak.tripod.com ) is the author of Malignant
Self Love - Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain - How the West
Lost the East. He served as a columnist for Global Politician,
Central Europe Review, PopMatters, Bellaonline, and eBookWeb, a
United Press International (UPI) Senior Business Correspondent, and
the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in
The Open Directory and Suite101.
Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government
of Macedonia.
Visit Sam's Web site at samvak.tripod.com
|