Doing Business on the Internet - Part XII
This letter constitutes a permission to reprint or mirror any and
all of the materials mentioned or linked to herein subject
to appropriate credit and linkback. Every article published MUST
include the author bio, including the link to the author's Web site
(at the bottom of this message).
===============================================================
Doing Business on the Internet - Part XII
By Sam Vaknin
Author of "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited"
These essays were published by the Israeli (Hebrew) edition of PC
Magazine back in 1996, when the Internet was in its formative epoch.
I have left them essentially unchanged, except for a few minor
errata I corrected. I find time travel fascinating. It is
interesting to recall the mainstream view, ten years ago, about the
Internet, its goals, its role, and its future. So, here goes:
The Bloodbath
This is the phase of consolidation. The number of players is
severely reduced. The number of browser types will be limited to 2-3
(Netscape, Microsoft and which else?). Networks will merge to form
privately owned mega-networks. Servers will merge to form hyper-
servers run on supercomputers in "server farms". The number of ISPs
will be considerably cut.
50 companies ruled the greater part of the media markets in the USA
in 1983. The number in 1995 was 18. At the end of the century they
will number 6.
This is the stage when companies - fighting for financial survival -
strive to acquire as many users/listeners/viewers as possible. The
programming is shallowed to the lowest (and widest) common
denominator. Shallow programming dominates as long as the bloodbath
proceeds.
>From Rags to Riches
Tough competition produces four processes:
1. A Major Drop in Hardware Prices
This happens in every medium but it doubly applies to a computer-
dependent medium, such as the Internet.
Computer technology seems to abide by "Moore's Law" which says that
the number of transistors which can be put on a chip doubles itself
every 18 months. As a result of this miniaturization, computing
power quadruples every 18 months and an exponential series ensues.
Organic-biological-DNA computers, quantum computers, chaos
computers - prompted by vast profits and spawned by inventive genius
will ensure the longevity and continued applicability of Moore's Law.
The Internet is also subject to "Metcalf's Law".
It says that when we connect N computers to a network - we get an
increase of N to the second power in its computing / processing
power. And these N computers are more powerful every year, according
to Moore's Law.
The growth of computing powers in networks is a multiple of the
effects of the two laws. More and more computers with ever
increasing computing power get connected and create an exponential
16 times growth in the network's computing power every 18 months.
2. Free Availability of Software and Connection
This is prevalent in the Net where even potentially commercial
software can be downloaded for free. In many countries television
viewers still pay for television broadcasts - but in the USA and
many other countries in the West, the basic package of television
channels comes free of charge.
As users / consumers form a habit of using (or consuming) the
software - it is commercialized and begins to carry a price tag.
This is what happened with the advent of cable television: contents
are sold for subscription and usage (Pay Per View - PPV) fees.
Gradually, this is what will happen to most of the sites and
software on the Net. Those which survive will begin to collect usage
fees, access fees, subscription fees, downloading fees and other,
appropriately named, fees. These fees are bound to be low - but it
is the principle that counts. Even a few cents per transaction will
accumulate to hefty sums with the traffic which will characterize
the Net (or, at least its more popular locales).
Adverising revenues will allow ISPs to offer free communication and
storage volume. Gradually, connect time charges imposed by the phone
companies will be eroded by tough competition from the likes of the
cable companies. Accessing the internet might well be free of all
charges in 10 years time.
3. Increased User Friendliness
As long as the computer is less user friendly and less reliable
(predictable) than television - less of a black box - its potential
(and its future) is limited. Television attracts 3.5 billion users
daily. The Internet will attract - under the most exuberant
scenario - less than one tenth of this number of people. The only
reasons for this disparity are (the lack of) user friendliness and
reliability. Even browsers, among the most user friendly
applications ever - are not sufficiently so. The user still needs to
know how to use a keyboard and must possess some basic acquaintance
with the operating system.
The more mature the medium, the more friendly it becomes. Finally,
it will be operated using speech or common language. There will be
room left for user "hunches" and built in flexible responses.
4. Social Taxes
Sooner or later, the business sector has to mollify the God of
public opinion by offerings of political and social nature. The
Internet is an affluent, educated, yuppie medium. It necessitates a
control of the English language, live interest in information and
its various uses (scientific, commercial, other), a lot of resources
(free time, money to invest in hardware, software and connect time).
It empowers - and thus deepens the divide between the haves and have-
nots, the knowing and the ignorant, the computer illiterate.
In short: the Internet is an elitist medium. Publicly, this is an
unhealthy posture. "Internetophobia" is already discernible. People
(and politicians) talk about how unsafe the Internet is and about
its possible uses for racial, sexist and pornographic purposes. The
wider public is in a state of awe.
So, site builders and owners will do well to begin to improve their
image: provide free access to schools and community centres,
bankroll internet literacy classes, freely distribute contents and
software to educational institutions, collaborate with researchers
and social scientists and engineers.
In short: encourage the view that the Internet is a medium catering
to the needs of the community and the underprivileged, a mostly
altruist endeavour. This also happens to make good business sense by
educating a future generation of users. He who visited a site when a
student, free of charge - will pay to do so when made an executive.
Such a user will also pass on the information within and without his
organization. This is called media exposure.
The future will, no doubt, witness public Internet terminals,
subsidized ISP accounts, free Internet classes and an
alternative "non-commercial, public" approach to the Net.
(continued)
==============================================================
AUTHOR BIO (must be included with the article)
Sam Vaknin ( samvak.tripod.com ) is the author of Malignant
Self Love - Narcissism Revisited and After the Rain - How the West
Lost the East. He served as a columnist for Global Politician,
Central Europe Review, PopMatters, Bellaonline, and eBookWeb, a
United Press International (UPI) Senior Business Correspondent, and
the editor of mental health and Central East Europe categories in
The Open Directory and Suite101.
Until recently, he served as the Economic Advisor to the Government
of Macedonia.
Visit Sam's Web site at samvak.tripod.com
|