*Note: The article presented here is written by authors not affiliated with hashemian.com.
This site is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or objectionable content.
Exercise care before engaging in business with any companies mentioned in this article.

Go to: /articles/2005/10/25/ for other articles.

We Are Off To See The S.E.M. Wizard, The Wonderful Wizard Of Oz

Free-Reprint Article Written by: Bill Platt See Terms of Reprint Below.

We have moved our TERMS OF REPRINT to the end of the article. Be certain to read our TERMS OF REPRINT and honor our TERMS OF REPRINT when you use this article. Thank you.

This article has been distributed by: Article-Distribution.com

Helpful Link: The Digital Millennium Copyright Act - Overview www.gseis.ucla.edu/iclp/dmca1.htm

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Article Title:
==============
We Are Off To See The S.E.M. Wizard, The Wonderful Wizard Of Oz

Article Description:
====================
In the process of Search Engine Marketing, far too many people get lost while they are searching for the Wizard of Oz.

Additional Article Information:
===============================
806 Words; formatted to 65 Characters per Line Distribution Date and Time: Tue Oct 25 02:01:01 EDT 2005

Written By: Bill Platt Copyright: 2005 Contact Email: comments@linksandtraffic.com

Article URL: thePhantomWriters.com/free_content/d/p/sem-wizard-of-oz.shtml Bill Platt's Picture URL: www.linksandtraffic.com/images/bill_platt_80x105b.jpg

For more free-reprint articles by this Author, please visit: thePhantomWriters.com/free_content/d/index.shtml#Bill_Platt

---------------------------------------------------------------------

We Are Off To See The S.E.M. Wizard, The Wonderful Wizard Of Oz Copyright © 2005 Bill Platt Links and Traffic www.LinksAndTraffic.com

In the process of Search Engine Marketing, far too many people get lost while they are searching for the Wizard of Oz.

TWISTED LOGIC

When creating web content for others, I am often blind-sided by the twisted logic of client webmasters. The point of writing original content for these people was to help them establish a legitimate presence in the search engines for their targeted niche.

Here is where the story gets odd...

A client had read somewhere that keyword density was the secret to his search engine success, and that his keyword density should be in the range of 12-15%.

The client interpreted this to mean that Keyword Phrase #1 should be 12-15% density, and Keyword Phrases #2 and #3 should be 7-8% density.

This breaks down to a 26-31% keyword density! Literally, one out of every three or four words will be a keyword!

If I wrote keyword-rich, keyword copy, that had the word "keyword" in every three to four words, my keyword copy would become keyword-laden, search engine keyword-ready, keyworded garbage.

It was difficult enough to write a 1-in-4 example above, let alone try to create a 1-in-3 example. I tried to explain this to the client and to suggest that we should write the content at 4% on each of the three keyword phrases bringing the density to a total of 12%.

I was met with resistance by the client. So, I sent a sample using the 12/7/7 ratio, just to show the client how bad his guidance would appear to the "human eye."

DOWN THE WINDING SPIRAL

I received this reply...

We are a little concerned on the quality and hope dropping the density will help with this. It seems these articles are the same generic points repeated, not really making a point.

With 1-in-4 keyword-to-word ratio's, what would you expect? Of course, it doesn't really make a point. It is nearly impossible to make sense throwing keywords in this close together.

We started again with the client changing his guidance to 10% on #1, and 5% on #2 and #3.

Following the new guidelines, the client thought he was learning that I did not really know how to write anything of any real quality, and he as much as told me so!

Last time out, the client changed his guidance to 9% on #1, 5% on #2, and 4% on keyword phrase #3.

Wow! We have managed to talk the client down from a 1-in-3 ratio to a 1-in-5 keyword ratio!

The client quit me, BECAUSE I did not have any talent as a writer!

ALONG THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD

One exchange between this client and myself really blew my mind! I knew the job was toast when I was told what I was told.

I had attempted to explain to the client that if we did create content for them that was this heavily laden with keywords, then we would be doing him a disservice. I explained that even if this content did manage to get him a Top 10 placement in the search engines, it would serve no value to him.

My reasoning was that if a search engine user arrived at his website from the search engine, and they saw his content with such keyword-heavy copy, they would not stay at his site. Instead, they would be racing to discover the BACK button in their browser.

I suggested that this was a recipe for failure. I suggested that Top 10 placement was meaningless, unless they could convert that visitor into a user/buyer. I told him that any copy that carried more than 12% total keyword density could not keep a visitor on his website, let alone convert that visitor into a buyer!

HE told me that it really did not matter to them how the content appeared to search engine's users! The only thing that was important to them was that they would be able to get Top Search Placement with their content.

MEET THE WIZARD

This client was off in his search to find a writer that could deliver a product that met all of his criteria. I will bet that he is still looking six months later.

This client was searching for the Wizard of Oz. He was searching for that infamous Top 10 Placement in Google.

What this client failed to realize is that the Wizard of Oz was a myth. It was just a man behind a machine.

Google is the machine; it is the Wonderful Wizard of Oz. And, the search engine user is the "man behind the machine."

Now, which of the two is actually going to buy what you are selling? Which one is going to pay your bills?

Search Engine Marketing is only effective when it also helps you to convert visitors, from the search engines, into paying customers.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Platt is the owner of www.LinksAndTraffic.com Link Building can be a painful process if you are doing it by yourself. Link Building becomes even more difficult when you try to meet the challenges of the new search engine marketing considerations of Natural Linking and VIPS technology. If you want to learn more about these topics, you can read our 7-page "Links and Traffic Tutorial": linksandtraffic.com/tutorial - 100% Money-Back Guarantee on All of our Link Building Options.

Article Topics
Adsense Advertising Bankruptcy Blog Credit Card
Debt Google Ira Marketing Mortgage
Real Estate Rental Retirement Rss Search Engine
Seo Stocks Tax
Recent Articles

Read Financial Markets  |   Home  |   Blog  |   Web Tools  |   News  |   Articles  |   FAQ  |   About  |   Contact

© 2001-2012 Robert Hashemian
Support the effort
Liked this page?
Please consider creating a link to it
from your Web site.

hashemian.com
هاشمیان.com

Home
Blog
Web Tools
News
Articles
FAQ
About
Contact
Financial Markets

Visits: Powered by hashemian.com

Search Hashemian.com