Why I chose to potentially lose up to 80% of my newsletter subscribers!
You have permission to publish this article electronically
or in print, free of charge, as long as the bylines are
included. A courtesy copy of your publication would be
appreciated - send to info@thetraderonline.com.
Title: Why I chose to potentially lose up to 80% of my newsletter subscribers!
Word Count: 535
Author: Richard Grady
Email: info@thetraderonline.com
Article URL: www.submityourarticle.com/articles/easypublish.php?art_id=4423
The article is preformatted to 60CPL.
Why I chose to potentially lose up to 80% of my newsletter subscribers!
Copyright 2006 Richard Grady
I have recently changed the service which I use to send my
email newsletter every couple of weeks. This has resulted
in all of my subscribers having to re-confirm that they
would like to continue receiving the newsletter.
Of course when dealing with moving such a large number of
people to a new service (over 40,000 subscribers!), it is
inevitable that I would lose some along the way. I am
still in the process of moving the list but I anticipated
from the start that I would lose as many as 80% of my
subscribers BUT, (and this is the thing you might think is
weird!), I am totally happy with that.
WHY?
Let me explain.....
Well there are several reasons:
1. I started building this newsletter list in 2001 so many
of the emails held on the list are several years old. I am
sure that several thousand addresses are 'old' and no
longer checked by the original user. How many of you have
the same email address that you had 5 years ago? I can
only estimate how many such addresses I have in my list but
for the sake of putting a figure on it, let's say 15% of
addresses are out of date.
2. As I have already stated above, I know that thousands
of people were not receiving the newsletter because of the
filtering policies of their ISP. I know this because I
have had emails on a regular basis from people that have
subscribed but never actually got the newsletters. I know
I had sent them, they just weren't getting through. Also,
since asking everyone to re-confirm their subscription,
several people have emailed to say that they have received
the new 'confirmation' email despite not having had a
newsletter for months. Again, I can only really estimate
this figure but based on the information I have, I reckon
that as many as 60% of the emails sent could fall into this
category.
3. For a variety of other reasons, I know that a large
percentage of newsletters sent are never read. For some
time now I have been publishing the newsletter as a web
page so I know exactly how many emails I have sent out and
how many people have gone on to read the newsletter. Let's
say that 10% of emails sent don't get read for 'other
reasons'.
Based on the figures above, 85% of previous newsletters
were either not getting to the intended recipient or were
not being read when they did get there. This estimate is
supported by the number of web page views each newsletter
was getting.
So you can begin to see why I was pretty relaxed about
reducing my subscriber list by so many names - there is
really no point in sending emails to so many people if such
a high percentage are not even receiving/reading them.
Basically I have 'trimmed the fat' from my list and now
have a smaller (though there are still several thousand of
you!) but far more up to date group of subscribers that I
know are interested in what I write about and that can
actually receive the newsletters when I send them :-)
About the Author:
Richard Grady has been helping people earn online since
1998. eBay sellers find wholesalers for free at:
www.wholesale118.co.uk (UK) &
www.thewholesaletrader.com (US).
|