BMW Automaker Web Site Banned in Google Death Penalty
Please consider this 650 word article about new Google
banning German Carmaker, BMW for search engine sp*m.
Make links live online and maintain the author resource box
and copyright information.
Please notify author of intent to publish at:
privacynotes.com/cgi-bin/M/msb.cgi?2
Consider using the Text to HTML converter at
www.website101.com/cgi-bin/t2h/Mt2h.cgi to embed
links, insert paragraph tags and format for your website.
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
BMW Automaker Web Site Banned in Google Death Penalty
Copyright © February 7, 2006 Mike Banks Valentine
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4685750.stm
BBC NEWS breaks search engine sp*m news, while this story has
been making the rounds of SEO/SEM forums and newsletters for
the past couple of days, since Matt Cutts posted about it in
his SEO blog on February 4th:
www.mattcutts.com/blog/ramping-up-on-international-webspam/
.... at first there was little international press (and none in
the US) on the issue, but the BBC story has started a
landslide of news and commentary on search engine sp*m by
major corporations. It is also likely to brand SEO's
universally as bad guy Black Hat SEO's and ignore the good
guy White Hats. Legitimate techniques and resulting ranking
improvements rarely gain the attention given the bad guys.
I've reported major Fortune 500 corporations for sp*mming
through the Google sp*m reporting link a half dozen times
over the past year and am happy to see actions being taken
against the worst offenders.
www.google.com/contact/spamreport.html
BMW Germany targeting the term "Used Cars" on it's new car
site using javascript redirects is a blatant abuse of doorway
pages and cloaking for inappropriate search phrases.
Cutts shows screen captures of the BMW offense, but mentions
only peripherally that Ricoh.de would be banned as well, then
sends a direct message to a separate US automaker at the end
of his sp*mming post, telling them that they'll be
re-included following a 30 day ban for similar offenses
they've apparently cleaned up from their European site.
Search engine sp*mming is certainly not limited to Europe,
although one of my complaints to the Google sp*m reporting
link is for a European company site, which 5 months after
reporting, STILL ranks #1 for a highly competitive phrase in
US results by using different search engine sp*mming
techniques employing invisible code full of links, H1 tags
and keyword phrases which are intended for surfers with
javascript turned off - the < noscript> tag. Search engines
see this invisible text, while surfers don't as it is buried
in the HTML code.
The home page of one site I reported for sp*mming is made up
entirely of images and has no hope of ranking well for any
search phrase from the home page due to complete lack of
text, so they may feel justified in using < noscript> tags to
rank for an admittedly appropriate search phrase, by using a
technique recognized as search engine sp*mming. When any
large corporation sees fit to use sp*mming techniques, it
encourages EVERYONE to do the same, simply because they feel
justified for whatever reason suits them, reasonable or not.
This lesser known technique, filling < noscript> tags with
H1, tags, keyword phrase hypertext links, and invisible text
within tags, is effective and is used by many sp*mmers. I
believe that smaller offenders would be instantly banned if
this were discovered in use on their site, even if they were
using appropriate keyword phrases for their topic or site
subject. The big boys should be penalized as well.
I'll feel better when ALL search engine sp*mming techniques
are penalized equally, regardless of the technique used or
terms targeted, or any rationalized justifications. When that
happens universally, then sp*mmers will stop sp*mming the
search engines. But not until then.
This BMW case has become high profile for a major offense and
is likely to gain attention in hurriedly called meetings in
boardrooms of major corporations, with webmasters and
marketing departments in attendance. "Are we doing this!"
CEO's will rage at befuddled webmasters or in-house SEO's.
But until ALL methods of search sp*m are penalized publicly,
those lesser offenses will continue at all levels -
especially large companies with more to gain (when they get
away with sp*mming) and to lose (when they get caught and
exposed/banned).
Mike Banks Valentine blogs on Search Engine developments
from RealitySEO.com and can be contacted for ethical
SEO work at: www.seoptimism.com/SEO_Contact.htm
He runs web content distribution site at: Publish101.com
|