Hip’s – The Full Story
Home owners will soon have just three months to sell their
homes or be forced to re-issue the seller’s information pack at
an estimated cost of £1000 for the average semi-detached home.
This would be in addition to the original £1000 paid out for
the original sales pack.
Much has been written about the Home Information Packs (HIP’s).
Here we aim to examine the final details, just released.
From June 2007 it will be compulsory for all sellers to produce
a dossier containing certain basic facts regarding the sale of
the property. Ministers estimation of the costs of this survey
are £776, a figure that the experts dispute. They say the
figure is much more likely to be £1000. These figures are based
on an average semi.
The information given in the dossier includes searches, deeds,
description of the property and an energy efficiency rating.
However, it appears that there are some rather worrying
exclusions in the list. For example, there is no reference to
rights of access, ground stability, natural subsidence or
effects of mining. Risks of flooding are not included; neither
is contamination from radon gas or other substances.
Telecommunication links seem to have been overlooked too.
Despite this cost to the seller, it appears that if a buyer is
borrowing in excess of 80% of the property value, they’ll still
be expected to commission and pay for valuations.
With regard to the three month time limit on sales, it appears
that mortgage lenders will refuse to advance cash to buyers
where the HIP is over three months old. Also, if house is taken
off the market for over 28 days within those three months, a new
HIP will have to be obtained. Where the reason for the property
being off the market for 28 days was connected with a sale, the
rule would not apply.
Where a property is marketed for sale on a private website or
even by a for sale sign in the garden, the failure to supply a
HIP will result in a fine of £200 per day.
In reaction to the announcement of these regulations, a Tory
spokesman was quoted as saying the packs were “expensive,
deficient and dangerous. The refusal to tell families whether
the back garden will be safe for their children or of potential
flood risks, delivers a serious blow to the credibility of these
packs.”
.The Law Society are concerned that there may be significant
defects in the scheme in the there is no provision in the
regulations for information within the HIP to be authenticated
or confirmed by the seller. They are of the opinion that there
should be a warning that reinforces to the buyer the risk of
taking on substantial liabilities and commitments.
When you take into consideration the fact that the VAT alone
from these packs will bring in £111m per year into the treasury
you realize why the Government has been accused of yet another
stealth tax implementation.
So there you have it. It appears to be that, for better or
worse, HIP’s are here to stay.
About The Author: Express has just launched a new section of
the site all about mortgages
www.express-life-insurance.co.uk/mortgages.php
Please use the HTML version of this article at:
www.isnare.com/html.php?aid=68161
|